The cervical jab, a vaccination that saves lives, or just another chemical cocktail with adverse side-effects? That is the question.
There is no doubt, dying of cervical cancer seems like a horrible way to go. And if there was a way to prevent it from happening, I’d be the first one to clap and cheer. But, is the Gardasil vaccine (cervarix in England) safe enough to administer to every adolescent girl? How much do we really know about the vaccine itself? Sure, those snappy ads chanting “One Less” filled with sporty, fresh-looking teenage girls and their dewey-eyed moms look very compelling, but do we really know enough about the side-effects this vaccine causes?
Today, in the Daily Mail of the UK, there is an article about a handful of girls and the reactions they’ve suffered since having the vaccine. One is in a wheelchair, another suffers almost daily epileptic attacks, yet another suffers from chronic fatigue. And these are just a selection of girls in that one country who have suffered side-effects from a sore arm, to paralysis. A number of deaths have been reported here in the USA. And yet, the medical professionals do whatever they can, except turning themselves inside out, to reject any claims that the sudden onset of illnesses following – sometimes within minutes, other times within days, of the vaccination – could have anything to do with the jab. It is just “coincidental” according to the professionals. But is it, really?
And, how true are the figures we are being presented, about the vaccines? 1300 adverse reactions out of 700,000 vaccinations. If, however, a lot of the adverse reactions being reported back to each medical professional who administered the drug, are being rejected as “coincidences”, how many are ACTUALLY reported as adverse reactions? Could it be that the number is actually double, triple or even quadruple that which the manufacturers of these drugs would like to have you believe? Maybe even more?
It was considered wrong to experiment on jews during the holocaust, or black soldiers in the Tuskeegee regiment, and it was, but why is it okay to experiment on our young girls? Is it because these shots supposedly save 700 lives a year? What if it destroys more than double that? A side-effect doesn’t have to be as severe as death, for it to destroy someone’s life, after all. How about we just lower the age when girls are given pap smears to screen for cervical cancer instead?
Or does that just not fill the wallets of those drug company executives?
Posted by kvinnorihop
Posted by kvinnorihop
pregnancy rate in the developed world. That’s a scary fact, don’t you think? Why do we have the highest teen pregnancy rate? I’ll tell you why.
Posted by kvinnorihop
Your empathy has been a tremendous help to get through this difficult time, and shows us that – after all – there are good and honest people in this world. We hope that the time will come when we can return to living a normal life.”